Here, in the autocratic organization, there are fewer levels which reduces the challenges of poor communication that might be caused because of too many levels. Due to this behaviour, the leader should yield the ultimate power and provide the employees with the motivation to work, i.e. They must control the consistency at a personal level, which means they can no longer afford to give their team any freedom to operate. Succession planning can be defined asa business strategy organizations use to pass leadership roles down to another employee or group of employees. Definition and Pros/Cons, Demings 14 Points For Quality Management [Explained], What is Deming Management? In a system of dependence, an autocratic leadership style creates a lack of trust between you and your workers. 4. For leaders who don't care much about power and prefer to be appreciated by being of service to others, this is the main advantage. Bad leaders can put a company out of business. They know themselves very well and try to bring people together to achieve the organisational goals. Everything rests with the leader. These benefits of autocratic leadership can swiftly take the team out of trouble. 6. The manager respects employees' insight and asks them to help make the best decision, and the team respects the leader's ability to ultimately make the right call after considering their viewpoints. Among all the recognized autocratic leadership strengths and weaknesses, perhaps one of the most prominent is that this leadership style can cause employees to resent their leader and even their organization. The theory, which is generally linked with autocratic leadership, assumes employees don't like to work and tend to focus on fulfilling self-interests. * Very limited or no input at all from the subordinates. Professionals operating under this leadership can have lower confidence and slower decision-making skills. This requires good two-way communication and often involves democratic discussion groups, which can offer useful suggestions and ideas. One of the greatest advantages to working with an autocratic leader is that the employee always knows what's expected and what will happen if they fail to perform as expected. Because of the vertical or one-way communication channel subordinates do not get the opportunity to share their ideas and thoughts. The Disadvantages of Laissez-Faire Leadership. Its advantages are as follows: 1) An autocratic leader is in close control of the organization. There are high levels of frustration often found in an autocratic environment, even if workers are inexperienced. The autocratic leadership style means that the person in charge has the entire control upon all decision making. Because of the strict method in which employees are micromanaged, there is no room for flexibility within the work environment. The leader shares defined roles and patterns of work with the employees. Management & Leadership Styles | Autocratic, Democratic, Paternalistic, Laissez- Faire and More Two Teachers 16K subscribers Subscribe 224 Share Save 27K views 3 years ago Business Studies Videos. Unlike, group decision-making the autocratic leader does not have to decide with his followers. Autocratic leaders make choices or decisions based on their own beliefs and do not involve others for their suggestion or advice. Since autocratic leadership ensures clearly defined structures, it clearly states what to do and how to do it. They can replicate results because they are given specific instructions to follow. Advantages Autocratic style of leadership is very effective in times of emergency or stress since people will always work from orders or commands of their leaders. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. For employees, an environment where decision-making is solely the managers job can mean a relatively low stress environment. 2. Every crisis or decision lies on their shoulders. These environments allow for an error margin of zero. php/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-autocratic- leadership-6069 While employees who need clear directive and feedback from their leader tend to do best under an autocrat, more experienced employees often do well in a more autonomous environment. So, there are. An autocratic leader focuses less on collecting input from team members and tends to make executive decisions that others are expected to follow. As with other leadership styles, there are autocratic leadership advantages and disadvantages that can have a significant impact on a leader's employees . What is autocratic leadership and its advantages? If there isnt enough time to develop personal skills or learn something new, then autocratic leaders are still able to get the job done. A work environment where autocratic leadership style is exercised is usually not friendly to innovation or creative thinking. That consistency leads toward corporate success. What Are The Advantages And Disadvantages Of Autocratic Leadership With little or no input by their subordinates, autocratic leaders are free to make decisions, define policies and direct work wherever they feel is most effective. Here are the top advantages of autocratic leadership: Faster Decision-making This leadership style enables quick decision-making, which is one of the most significant benefits of autocratic leadership. Inexperienced employees need a detailed layout and instructions to complete taskstraits an autocratic leader is known for. Autocratic leaders generally could use organizational . Authoritative leaders are most consistent in their approaches and systems. Some employees dont like the idea of being asked to make an important decision about the future of the company. Even workers who like to explore creative solutions dont mind an autocratic leader when they are allowed to pitch new ideas or offer an alternative decision based on their personal experience. For example, a communication style that can be considered barking orders can be critical in high-stakes environments, like among paramedics, but destructive in collaborative environments like university departments. - consultative although the manager will have the final say. One of the benefits of autocratic leadership is that it can help an inexperienced team achieve goals that they wouldn't be able to do alone. That means a decision is made on the timetable of the leader and no one else. Autocratic leaders cant make trust a priority because they are forced to make the rules be the priority. December 28, 2021 by Raj Verdhan. One of the primary reasons why the autocratic leadership style tends to fail is because it is fully dependent upon the skills and knowledge of the leader. As only the leader makes decisions, the management may or may not provide feedback. Although this form of leadership is often found within the government, it is also present in some corporate structures as well. When an autocratic leader becomes burnt out and cannot fulfill their duties, the rest of the team is often ill-equipped to step in and take the lead because they have never been in that position before. Autocratic leadership always encourages one-way communication to eliminate this problem. This is an advantage because team members can continue projects, move deadlines, and remove obstacles that could negatively impact their overall productivity. Did you know that autocratic leadership is great when it comes to handling crises? advantages of the autocratic leadership style, autocratic leadership style advantages and disadvantages. There is no doubting where fault lies of poor decisions. The leader is the only one who is in charge of the situation. Employees do not get recognition for their efforts. 9 Advantages and Disadvantages of Autocratic Leadership Style To be a great authentic leader, you should accept yourself for who you truly are. The decision can be made faster with this leadership style. In addition, the leaders directly communicate to their followers where the work is to be done. Characteristics Of An Autocratic Leadership Style | ipl.org Advantages of autocratic leadership style. This style tends to decrease employee performance when additional duties are imposed on the employees without consultation. They just want to come to work, do what theyre told, then go home at the end of the day with a paycheck. Advantages The pros of this approach include: Decisions can be made rapidly which may keep the team agile and very quick to respond to challenges. Provides a clear sense of direction Anyone who's worked on a class group project knows the value of having a leader. Most autocratic leaders will not take the opinions, experiences, or knowledge of their team members into account when making decisions. 11 Autocratic Leadership Advantages and Disadvantages If an autocratic leader is put in charge of an inexperienced team, theyll be able to get the job done by outlining specific instructions to follow. Though autocratic leadership style is often criticised, it is true that many historic autocratic leaders have been innovators who unleashed revolutions in different fields. If that leader does not create a fair working environment, then it is difficult for any employees to change that environment. Decentralisation and Leadership Styles (AQA Paper 1 2019, Q20) Exam Support What is leadership? A team can become so dependent upon the leader that they stop functioning when their directions are no longer present. The procedures and rules might seem rigid. Autocracy in the workplace also results in high employee turnover. It is therefore easy for the autocratic leaders to make the organisational goals clear to the subordinates resulting in better and higher commitment to the accomplishment of the goals. It can also mean workers personal needs are neglected, causing them to feel like their supervisor does not care about them as individuals. However, they describe the disadvantages of this style as promoting staff defiance, lack of free . Autocratic leadership style works better in situations where swift decisions are needed. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); At BokasTutor, We aim to provide easy and insightful explanations on different topics of disciplines like Management, Marketing, Finance, Business, and Entrepreneurship. Employee morale can also be negatively affected when autocratic leadership is employed. Autocratic leadership Advantages And Disadvantages. and lack of staff initiative (2015). The Advantages And Disadvantages Of Autocratic Leadership Laissez-Faire Leadership Explained by a CEO. Pros/Cons, Examples That means workers who are highly skilled or motivated begin to lose their incentives to stay active under this leadership structure. The lack of flexibility in environments headed by autocratic leaders can drive creative and motivated employees away. Advantages and disadvantages of charismatic leadership style They use their personal experiences to form rules or regulations that translate into step-by-step instructions for workers to follow. People who rely on this leadership style are often viewed as dictators or bossy. They will delegate to them the authority to do this (empowerment) and listen to their advice. That reduces the productivity available, and eventually leads to declining morale. Although they set their rules and regulations to control the team, they also play a significant role in eradicating employee stress. They wont get blamed if it fails and they wont get credit if it succeeds. This ensures that employees are exercising best of their abilities to get the job done, and time and other resources are not wasted. Working with a supervisor who makes all expectations clear and specifies exactly how to perform tasks can make the process of acclimating to a new work environment much easier for the employee. 1. The procedures and rules might seem rigid. As autocratic leaders usually make decisions without consulting their team members, it may cause team members dislike towards the leadership. What is Autocratic Leadership? The Definition and - toolshero In the permissive version, the autocratic leader still makes the final decision, but extends some flexibility to their direct reports in how tasks are completed. That means there is a priority on consistency, with each team member performing their job functions in a similar way. Definition, Features, Principles, and Cycle, What is TQM? However, this is not feasible for the majority of decisions taken by a business- indeed one of the criticisms of this style is that it can take longer to reach a decision. One of the primary characteristics of autocratic leadership is a clearly defined chain of command. But rarely do employees know that there are several. What Are the Pros and Cons of Autocratic Leadership? | SB In many ways, it could be described as, Do it my way or go hit the highway. Workers get the job done, or else they go find a different job. What makes a good leader or manager? Autocratic & Democratic - Advantages and disadvantages table in A Level Autocratic leadership refers to a form of leadership in which a leader takes choices without consulting others. 1. The employees need not wait for the thumbs up from seniors or ask for a deadline extension if they can get all the approvals and data on time. Although in authoritarian leadership, there is one-way communication there also exists effective communication. Leaders are of different types. Autocratic Leadership (Authoritarian): A leadership style in which an individual is in control of all the decisions and tasks and his/her "followers" have little to no say in the final decision. While the advantages and disadvantages of leadership styles are not always readily apparent, one thing is certain - being decisive while avoiding autocratic leadership tactics is necessary for successful leaders and negotiators alike. In this kind of leadership mostly leader makes new contacts with outside people. Since organisation is key to a well-operated business, autocratic leadership can prove useful in situations where the organisation could advance within the company. 1. Autocratic leadership can be defined as a leadership style where an individual leader holds the decision-making power over all organizational members and all activities. Employees, in turn, learn discipline and consistency from their leader. Create a leadership learning plan. PDF Advantages and disadvantages of autocratic leadership pdf It may impair the morale of the group. - good style for meetings. Although an autocratic leader can have a challenging personality, most employees prefer to work in an environment where there are clear expectations set for them. And when it comes to long-term issues, autocratic leaders know how to direct traffic through the hierarchies. There are many qualities that are needed to be a good leader or manager. Second, autocratic leadership gives the leader an enormous amount of power in deciding how the team operates, but this also means increasing responsibility and accountability. They arent required to wait for the feedback from senior managers or consult with a leadership team. The three commonly observed leadership . 19 Advantages and Disadvantages of Democratic Leadership Style Management & Leadership Styles | Autocratic, Democratic - YouTube Such a group process usually, takes a longer time to come to decision. Required fields are marked *. A military leader who cannot make executive decisions can cause a security breach during critical operations, and military personnel who do not receive clear, direct orders from their leaders can become confused and fail to act when necessary. In such organizations, the leader has a small number of tasks to handle and the number of employees is also few. Tel: +44 0844 800 0085. An autocratic leader makes decisions and communicates them on time, making sure that the team has all the information they need to finish the project on schedule. Autocratic leadership is a type of leadership that is individual-centric. Motivation and reward for leaders: It provides strong motivation and reward for the leader. Likewise, as an autocratic leader is not necessarily the same as being a fascist, there are people with certain personalities, who may indeed work well under this type of leadership style (Murphy, 2019). Even if the leader is not knowledgeable in the area, they are forced into a position where they must decide.